There are not only important differences in the approach to specific issues, such as fisheries (while the EU calls for the continued application of the principle of the EU`s Common Fisheries Policy and its system of allowable catch totals on the basis of a fixed percentage allocation agreed in a trade agreement, the UK insists that annual negotiations on access to UK and European waters be concluded and if an agreement has not been reached found in a year. temporarily to stop fishing rights; The letters exchanged between the parties last week also have a significantly more “formal” tone. The breadth and number of these documents alone illustrate the fundamental and central issue of differences between the parties: while the EU wishes to agree on a comprehensive comprehensive agreement covering all aspects of future relations, the UK proposes separate contracts on specific issues, which will be negotiated individually. In addition to the DRAFT UK-EU Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (CFTA), the United Kingdom has therefore published the following draft individual treaties: the agreement also provides for a transitional period that will last until 31 December 2020 and which can be renewed by mutual agreement. During the transitional period, EU legislation will continue to apply to the UK (including participation in the European Economic Area, the internal market and the customs union) and the UK will continue to contribute to the EU budget, but the UK will not be represented in EU decision-making bodies. The transition period will give businesses time to adapt to the new situation and the new era, so that the British and European governments can negotiate a new trade agreement between the EU and the UK.   Immediately after the announcement of a revised withdrawal agreement on October 17, 2019, Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the DUP declared that they could not support the new agreement.  The fifth part of the draft treaty defines the proposed governance structure for relations and general dispute resolution. It proposes a first step for consultations within the Partnership Council, with the possibility of obtaining a referral to arbitration as a second step.
The recently published draft British Treaty and the subsequent exchange of letters between the UK`s chief negotiator david Frost and his European counterpart Michel Barnier underline the distance between the two negotiating pages (Mr Frost`s letter is available here, Mr Barnier`s answer is available here). Part 4 of the draft text deals with the UK`s participation in EU programmes and good financial management. It covers the financial conditions of the UK`s participation in EU programmes, which would include a combined amount of registration fees and an operational contribution. EU institutions have the right to audit and audit individuals and entities in the UK that receive EU funding. Programmes in which the United Kingdom participates would be identified in a currently empty protocol. On 15 January 2019, the House of Commons voted with 230 votes against the Brexit withdrawal agreement the largest vote against the British government in history.  The government may survived a vote of confidence the next day.  On March 12, 2019, the House of Commons voted 149 votes against the agreement, the fourth-biggest defeat of the government in the history of the House of Commons.  A third vote on the Brexit withdrawal agreement, widely expected on 19 March 2019, was rejected by the House of Commons spokesman on 18 March 2019, on the basis of a parliamentary convention of 2 April 1604, which prevented British governments from forcing the House of Commons to vote several times on a subject already voted on by the House of Commons.    An abbreviated version of the withdrawal agreement, in which the annex political statement had been withdrawn, consisted of the test of “substantial amendments,” so that a third vote was held on 29 March 2019, but was rejected by 58 votes.
 The agreement covers issues such as money, citizens` rights, border agreements and dispute resolution.